Op-Ed: Private insurance plays a critical part in home mortgage ecosystem

 

 

 

 

By Lindsey Johnson

2/17/19

Housing finance reform remains a priority in Washington. Earlier this month, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) released a proposal to reform the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Like many other proposals, including House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters’ (D-Calif.) HOME Forward draft legislation, Chairman Crapo’s proposal recognizes the important role that private capital — and specifically private mortgage insurance — serves to facilitate homeownership for low down-payment borrowers and protect taxpayers from mortgage credit risk.

The nominee for director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Mark Calabria, recently appeared before the Senate Banking Committee as part of his confirmation process. He’s an individual who appreciates the benefits that private mortgage insurance extends beyond protecting the government and taxpayers.

Private mortgage insurance remains the longest serving, time-tested way to help low down-payment borrowers qualify for home financing in the conventional market.

Our nation’s mortgage finance system is one that must balance access to credit for consumers while also shielding taxpayers. Fortunately, private mortgage insurance is uniquely and permanently dedicated to serving both objectives through all economic cycles. As such, it should remain a critical piece of any future, reformed system.

Access to affordable, low down-payment mortgages is understandably top-of-mind for many policymakers. While there is an important role for government and taxpayer-backed programs to play in the broader system, any comprehensive reform should first encourage the greater use of private capital that ensures access to affordable low down-payment mortgages in the conventional market.

Fortunately, there is generally bipartisan agreement around this principle. Facilitating this kind of mortgage lending is precisely the purpose of private mortgage insurance, which has helped more than 30 million families secure home loans over the last six decades — many of whom were first-time or middle-income homebuyers.

Last year, more than 1 million homeowners qualified to purchase or refinance their home thanks to private mortgage insurance. Of these homeowners, nearly 60 percent were first-time homebuyers and more than 40 percent had incomes below $75,000.

Congressional leaders and the Trump administration must reform the housing finance system into one that works for all Americans by protecting taxpayers while also ensuring access to affordable mortgage financing.

The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies projected that the U.S. would add 13.6 million households between 2015 and 2025, which means affordable low down-payment options must be part of the equation.

Mortgage insurance companies support the government-sponsored enterprises and mortgage lenders in the origination of low- to moderate- income mortgage programs that address affordable housing needs of local communities.

The private mortgage insurance industry stands ready to continue its role as the solution to enable millions of families to achieve homeownership.

A version of this op-ed originally appeared in The Hill on February 17, 2019.

Newsletter: February 2019

As the 116th Congress settles in, there has already been a lot of housing finance activity. Yesterday, the Senate Banking Committee (SBC) held a hearing on the nomination of Mark Calabria to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA); while on Wednesday the House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) held a hearing on housing challenges, most notably homelessness. Recently, the chairs of both of these committees each outlined their priorities for housing finance reform.  The FHFA also decided to no longer defend the constitutionality of its structure in court, amid an ongoing lawsuit filed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the “GSEs”) shareholders. Finally, as this is our first Roundup in 2019, we highlight that at the end of 2018, USMI President Lindsey Johnson testified along with other trade association and nonprofit executives before the HFSC on bipartisan housing finance proposals.

  • Senate Banking holds confirmation hearing on FHFA Director nominee, Mark Calabria. On February 14, the SBC held a hearing on Mark Calabria’s nomination to serve as FHFA Director. At the hearing, Dr. Calabria expressed his intent to make the FHFA a “world class regulator” and promote a “well capitalized, strong system that preserves the 30-year mortgage and does provide access to affordable housing.” While he acknowledged that the FHFA can take certain actions to strengthen the GSEs, Dr. Calabria stressed that fundamental changes to the housing finance system must be done by Congress. During exchanges with members of the Committee, Dr. Calabria stated his support for moving away from a system that privatizes gains while socializing losses and explained that the ultimate goal should be a framework with sufficient capital and regulation that allows the GSEs to facilitate affordable housing for creditworthy borrowers. USMI released a statement on Dr. Calabria’s nomination, which can be found here.
  • Senate Banking Chairman Crapo releases GSE reform outline. SBC Chairman Mike Crapo’s (R-ID) housing reform outline serves as a blueprint for comprehensive bipartisan reform efforts. It builds off of other proposals that put into place “multiple private guarantors” to guarantee the timely repayment of principal and interest to investors of eligible mortgages that are securitized through a platform operated by Ginnie Mae. The outline also requires, among other things, that the FHFA establish a capital requirement for all approved guarantors and require that all private guarantors engage in credit risk transfer. In a statement, USMI noted that “the reform plan covers many areas and [USMI] is particularly pleased that Chairman Crapo recognizes the importance and value of private mortgage insurance in enabling access to low down payment conventional mortgages while protecting taxpayers at least to the levels that they are protected today.”
  • House Financial Services holds hearing on housing challenges. On February 13, the HFSC held a hearing that examined housing challenges in rural communities, including homelessness, rental housing, and homeownership, as well as legislative proposals to address aspects of these issues. As Chairwoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) noted, the hearing marked the “very first time that the full committee has convened a hearing focused entirely on homelessness” and discussed a bill that she introduced last congress that would allocate more than $13 billion over five years to programs to prevent homelessness. Chairwoman Waters is expected to reintroduce the bill this Congress. This will be a priority for the HFSC in the 116th Congress and Chairwoman Waters emphasized the need for “proactive solutions to ensure that every American has a safe, affordable place to call home.”
  • House Financial Services Chairwoman Waters releases housing finance reform priorities. Chairwoman Waters similarly outlined her agenda for housing reform, which seeks to address the longtime conservatorship of the GSEs. Notably, she highlighted the importance of private mortgage insurance (MI) in any future reformed system, stating that one of her main priorities is to ensure “sufficient private capital is in place to protect taxpayers.” The list of principles also includes requiring transparency to ensure a level playing field for all financial institutions and maintaining access for all qualified borrowers that can sustain homeownership. HFSC Ranking Member Patrick McHenry (R-NC) sent a letter to Waters requesting she convene hearings in critical areas including on “government-sponsored enterprises and the role of the federal government in mortgage finance to explore paths to ending the government conservatorship of Fannie Maeand Freddie Mac” and the “continued oversight of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and its Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Accounting Standard.”
  • Government changes course on question of FHFA constitutionality. Recently, the FHFA filed a supplemental brief with the S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stating that it will no longer defend the constitutionality of the FHFA’s single-director leadership structure in court. This ruling comes as the result of a lawsuit brought by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders who have challenged the structure of the FHFA and the so-called “Third Amendment Sweep” by the Treasury Department. In July 2018, the federal appeals court reversed a previous court’s decision and agreed with shareholders that the FHFA’s structure was unconstitutional.
  • USMI’s President testifies before Congress. At the end of December, Lindsey Johnson testified before the HFSC in a hearing entitled “A Legislative Proposal to Provide for a Sustainable Housing Finance System: The Bipartisan Housing Finance Reform Act of 2018;” a bill introduced by former HFSC Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), and Reps. John Delaney (D-MD) and Jim Himes (D-CT).  USMI’s testimony addressed several important housing finance topics and discussed the role private MI can play in a reformed housing finance system, specifically in enabling homeownership while protecting taxpayers and the government from mortgage credit risk. She also highlighted key improvements to the industry that make it more resilient going forward.  Specific to the draft legislation, Johnson provided several observations including that private MI is compatible with most proposals for reform because it is done at the loan level, and therefore the credit protection travels with the loan from the first day it is originated whether the loan is placed onto a lenders’ balance sheet, sold to an investor, or sold into a securitization pool. USMI’s testimony also provided several recommendations for the draft legislation, chief among them that any proposal should rely on loan level credit enhancement done by entities that can manage mortgage credit risk through all market cycles. During the hearing, Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) touted the value of MI stating: “I certainly agree that we need more PMI and we need more credit risk transfers, and the more private capital that we can get in here, the better. Even if we do need a federal guaranty, let’s make sure that private capital has a robust first lost position.” The full list of witnesses and their testimonies can be found here.

Statement: Senate Banking Committee Chairman’s Outline for Reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

WASHINGTON — Lindsey Johnson, President of U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI), today issued the following statement on the outline released today by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) on proposed reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSEs) and the housing finance system:

“Today Chairman Crapo released a thoughtful outline to reform the GSEs in order to put the housing finance system on more stable footing. The reform plan covers many areas and USMI is particularly pleased that Chairman Crapo recognizes the importance and value of private mortgage insurance in enabling access to low down payment conventional mortgages while protecting taxpayers at least to the levels that they are protected today.  Ten years after conservatorship of the GSEs, it is essential that meaningful reforms be done to better protect taxpayers and to ensure consumers will have access to mortgage finance credit through all market cycles.

“USMI is pleased to see Chairman Crapo provide these ideas for reform and we look forward to working with his office and the Committee on the details of these concepts.  We are committed to working with the Senate, House, and the Administration to promote reforms that put more private capital in front of taxpayer risk and to create a more sustainable housing finance system that works for consumers, market participants, and taxpayers.

“For more than 60 years, MI has provided effective credit risk protection for our nation’s mortgage finance system and helped 30 million families become homeowners.  This time-tested form of private capital stands ready to continue minimizing taxpayer risk while ensuring that mortgage credit remains accessible and affordable.”

###

U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) is dedicated to a housing finance system backed by private capital that enables access to housing finance for borrowers while protecting taxpayers. Mortgage insurance offers an effective way to make mortgage credit available to more people. USMI is ready to help build the future of homeownership. Learn more at www.usmi.org.

Blog: Mortgage insurance — added cost to homebuying or smart way to get in?

The homebuying process is exciting, but can also seem fraught with added costs, like a home inspection, title insurance and closing costs. And if you can’t afford a full 20 percent down payment on a conventional home loan, then you will most likely pay for private mortgage insurance (MI). Some people consider private MI yet another added cost, but it helps creditworthy middle-income homebuyers qualify for home financing sooner with a low down payment. Is it really an added cost if it saves time and money in the long run?

For most people, low down payment home loan options include conventional loans with private MI and government-backed loans like those offered by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). While comparable, each of these options has important differences. For example, the minimum down payment for an FHA mortgage is 3.5 percent while it’s only 3 percent on a conventional, privately insured mortgage.

Another key feature of private MI is that it can be canceled when a borrower reaches 20 percent equity in his or her home. Borrowers who purchase a home with private MI can typically cancel it within 5 to 7 years, resulting in their monthly bill going down. Private MI’s cancelability makes it a more affordable option over FHA-backed mortgages, which typically require mortgage insurance premiums for the entirety of the loan term. Both are offered by most mortgage lenders, so it’s smart to ask a loan officer for both options so you can compare and do the math.

The myth that a homebuyer needs 20 percent down to obtain a mortgage is simply not true. Low down payment mortgages are widely available and used every day across the country. In 2018, the National Association of Realtors found that first-time homebuyers typically put down 7 percent, while repeat buyers put down an average of 16 percent. Many homebuyers choose a lower down payment option to preserve some savings for home improvements or save for other goals. The time it could take to save up a 20 percent down payment is significant. On average, it could take up to 20 years to save a full 20 percent, plus closing costs, for a $257,700 house — the national median sales price. With home prices on the rise, the amount of time it takes to save up could only increase. Private MI can mean the difference between getting into the home of your dreams sooner or waiting for years.

For over 60 years, more than 30 million homeowners of all backgrounds have used private MI to successfully buy their homes. In the past year alone, private MI helped more than one million borrowers nationwide purchase or refinance a mortgage. According to a study by U.S. Mortgage Insurers, 56 percent of purchase borrowers were first-time homebuyers and more than 40 percent had incomes below $75,000.

For decades, millions of homeowners and prospective homebuyers have relied on private MI to help them affordably and responsibly purchase their homes — in turn helping them build personal wealth. Today’s historically low mortgage interest rates are a good reason to buy a home now. It is estimated that in 2019, the average rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage will be around 5 percent. Borrowers should take advantage of these historically low mortgage interest rates because experts forecast that primary mortgage rates are on the rise.

Getting a mortgage with private MI and keeping more of your hard-earned money in the bank can be a very smart way to invest in your future. Check out lowdownpaymentfacts.orgto learn more.

Blog: Private Mortgage Insurance Is Helping First-Time Homebuyers Become Homeowners

By Lindsey Johnson

A myth about homeownership that discourages many prospective homeowners is that they need a 20 percent down payment to obtain a home loan. Not true! What many borrowers do not realize is that they can qualify for a mortgage with significantly less than 20 percent down. This is particularly true when it comes to first-time homebuyers.

A recent survey from the National Association of REALTORS® found that among first-time homebuyers who obtained a mortgage, more than 70 percent made a down payment of less than 20 percent. What’s more, according to Genworth Mortgage Insurance’s August 2018 “First-Time Homebuyer Market Report,” 66 percent of all homebuyers using low down payment mortgages were first-time buyers, and 79 percent of all first-time homebuyers used some form of low down payment mortgages.

As first-time homebuyers consider taking the exciting leap into homeownership, it’s important for them to fully understand all the home loan options available in the market. Of the variety of home loans available, conventional loans with private mortgage insurance (MI) stand out as one of the most competitive and affordable paths to homeownership.

U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) recently released a report highlighting how MI helps bridge the down payment gap in the United States and promotes homeownership. Importantly, the report confirmed what has long been known: MI makes it easier for creditworthy borrowers with limited down payments to access conventional mortgage credit. Specifically, the report found:

  • MI has helped nearly 30 million families nationally purchase or refinance a home over the last 60 years
  • In 2017 alone, MI helped more than one million borrowers purchase or refinance a home
  • Of the total 2017 number, 56 percent of purchase loans went to first-time homebuyers and more than 40 percent of those borrowers had annual incomes below $75,000, which further demonstrates that MI serves middle-income households
  • At the state level, Texas ranks first in terms of the number of homeowners (79,030) who were able to purchase or refinance a home with MI in 2017. This was followed by California (72,938), Florida (69,827), Illinois (47,866), and Michigan (41,810)

Data show that today many Americans are spending more of their income on rent than they are on mortgage payments. From 1985 to 2000, the share of income spent on mortgage payments was 21 percent; in Q2 2018 it was 18 percent. Conversely, from 1985 to 2000 the share of income spent on rent was slightly higher at 26 percent and has risen to 28 percent as of Q2 2018. As many individuals and families look to make the step from renting to owning their own home to create greater stability and build long-term equity, it’s essential that these individuals have prudent low down payment options – such as private MI – available for their future homeownership needs.

In addition to the wealth creation that homeownership fosters, today’s historically low mortgage interest rates are a good reason to buy a home now. Over the course of nearly 35 years, the housing market has experienced an extraordinary decline in mortgage interest rates. In 1981, the average rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage stood at over 18 percent; it stood at approximately 4.72 percent at the end of September 2018. Borrowers should take advantage of these historically low mortgage interest rates because housing finance experts forecast that this interest rate decline is over, and primary mortgage rates are on the rise.

Homebuyers shouldn’t sit on the sidelines and put off buying the home of their dreams simply because they aren’t in the position to put 20 percent down. Since 1957, MI has helped millions of Americans – particularly first-time homebuyers – become successful homeowners, and it will continue to be a foundation of the housing market and a resource for borrowers in the years to come.

Blog: Areas of Alignment for Administrative Reform

September marked the 10th anniversary of the GSEs being placed into conservatorship and there is growing recognition that Congress may not be able to tackle the complex issue of housing reform until 2019 or perhaps even later. But not all aspects of housing reform need to wait for action by Congress. USMI has produced the following white paper to assist the Trump Administration, particularly the Department of Treasury and the independent Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), in identifying the key areas where the Administration should focus its efforts and specific steps the Administration can take to put the housing finance system on a more sustainable path. USMI provides specific recommendations to:

  • Reduce the duopolistic market power of the GSEs
  • Increase transparency
  • Expand private capital and reduce taxpayer risk
  • Promote a strong regulator that establishes uniform standards and uses transparent processes to assess the GSEs’ activities and products

While reforming the GSEs and putting the housing finance system on a more stable, sustainable path is the primary focus of this paper, it is essential that reform is not done in a vacuum. True housing finance reform should also address the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and dynamics between private and government-insured lending channels to balance taxpayer protection with access to mortgage finance. Actions taken under Administrative reform could further reduce taxpayer risk, level the playing field between the GSEs and private market participants, and provide greater transparency regarding GSE pricing and practices. Further, Administrative reforms could be the catalyst needed to break the legislative logjam and enable Congress to enact comprehensive housing reform legislation.

The full paper can be downloaded here. Below, USMI has outlined 11 key takeaways for policymakers to consider when contemplating the future of housing finance. A PDF of these recommendations can be downloaded here.

Blog: House Financial Services Hearing Examining 10 Years of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under Government Conservatorship

WASHINGTON — Lindsey Johnson, President of U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI), today published the following blog on USMI.org in response to today’s U.S. House Financial Services Committee hearing entitled “A Failure to Act: How a Decade Without GSE Reform Has Once Again Put Taxpayers at Risk”:

“Today’s hearing on the GSE’s (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) 10 years in government conservatorship—after U.S. taxpayers provided a $187 billion bailout during the financial crisis—serves as an important reminder that the housing finance system still needs serious reform. While Fannie and Freddie are healthier today thanks to a prolonged period of favorable economic and housing conditions, and new safeguards that have improved the stability of the overall mortgage finance system, we must work to ensure the system is put on a stable footing for the long term. Policymakers should consider reaffirming boundaries for the GSEs in the secondary mortgage markets, reducing their duopolistic market power to level the playing field for competitive private capital opportunities, and increasing transparency in the GSEs’ operations so that all participants in the housing finance system have the clarity they need to foster and support a healthy and accessible mortgage market.

“Since the GSEs were placed into conservatorship, their footprint, market dominance, and reach into the mortgage finance system has expanded. USMI continues to be concerned with the GSEs’ mission creep and the lack of transparency in certain GSE expanded activities. For example, the financing of mortgage servicing rights for a select group of non-bank lenders; new credit enhancement mechanisms, like Freddie Mac’s IMAGIN and Fannie Mae’s EPMI pilot programs, that seek to disintermediate private capital; and participating in single-family rental pilot programs, among others. Many of these new products and activities raise alarms about the GSEs’ expanding roles in the housing finance system without a clear rational or need as they represent a significant blurring of the bright line separation between primary market and secondary market activities, as well as greater vertical integration of private sector activities into the GSEs.

“The Federal Housing Finance Agency recently announced it is ending the GSEs’ single-family rental pilot programs, which it said it was doing on a ‘test and learn basis,’ citing that it has since learned the market can function without the GSEs. FHFA needs to end other GSE pilots and programs that encroach on private market functions, including the IMAGIN and EPMI products introduced earlier this year.

“There is a robust and healthy private mortgage insurance market that is meeting the market’s needs and it is unnecessary for the GSEs to compete directly with the private sector. The GSEs should not be allowed to create programs that crowd out a time-tested, robustly regulated, and highly capitalized industry that facilitates prudent access to low down payment mortgage financing across the country and on a permanent basis through various economic cycles.

“To achieve comprehensive reform, USMI believes certain principles must be met that will guarantee a robust housing finance system that promotes successful and affordable homeownership. These principles include establishing a coordinated housing policy that promotes private capital ahead of taxpayer exposure, enabling access to homeownership and affordable mortgage credit with private mortgage insurance, and deepening the level of mortgage insurance currently used with conventional low down payment loans. It is long overdue that we strike the right balance for taxpayers in establishing complementary roles for the Federal Housing Administration and the conventional low down payment mortgage market, which is predominately guaranteed by private mortgage insurance.

“Since 1957, mortgage insurers have supported the U.S. housing market, enabling homeownership opportunities for nearly 30 million Americans by providing insurance on mortgage loans where borrowers cannot afford a 20 percent down payment. USMI will continue to work with Congress and the administration to create a more coordinated, consistent, and transparent housing system—a system that can expand private capital’s role in shouldering more risk in front of taxpayers.”

On September 5, USMI joined 28 other organizations on a letter to Congress and the Administration calling for GSE reform.

Newsletter: August 2018

It’s been an action-packed summer for housing finance. The Washington Post reported on down payments being the chief hurdle for homebuyers across the country, citing USMI’s recent report on private mortgage insurance’s role in homeownership. There have also been substantive conversations about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s (the GSEs) footprint and future. American Enterprise Institute (AEI) held a conference on the GSEs’ market activities, while Politico published an in-depth article on their market expansion. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell also testified before Congress and both fielded questions on GSE-related matters. These GSE-related developments come as Fannie Mae CEO Timothy Mayopoulos announced his retirement by year’s end and, as National Mortgage News reported, when stakeholders and influencers are keenly focused on the Administration’s pick for the next Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director. In other news, the U.S. Senate held a nomination hearing for Michael Bright to become President of Ginnie Mae, and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner Brian Montgomery discussed his priorities.

  • The Washington Post reports on the benefits of private mortgage insurance. Last week, The Washington Post featured an article focused on the difficulty for many Americans to save a 20 percent down payment to buy a home, and how private mortgage insurance (PMI) can help. In the piece, the author writes about the long wait time it can take Virginia, Maryland, and DC borrowers to save 20 percent down for a home, and cites USMI’s recently released state report. The article also highlights that in 2017, 56% of purchase loans with PMI went to first-time homebuyers. 
  • AEI hosts discussion on GSE mission creep. AEI hosted an event that discussed the GSEs’ footprint in the housing finance system and their history of mission creep into the primary market. Panelists at the event, which included an array of respected housing finance experts, cited examples of direct-to-consumer product marketing, lines of credit to non-bank servicers, dramatic expansions in the multifamily market, and opaque pilots that directly compete with traditional forms of loan-level credit enhancement. Panelists unanimously agreed that housing finance reform is necessary and it’s inappropriate for the GSEs to expand their footprint and market power while in conservatorship. Key observations include:
    • Michael Fratantoni (Mortgage Bankers Association): “There is constant concern that [the GSEs] are stretching beyond their defined role in the marketplace… In this conventional conforming there should be a bright line between what primary market entities do and what secondary market entities – like Fannie and Freddie – do.”
    • Michael Stegman (Milken Institute): “The lack of transparency in pricing, capital, and cross-subsidy have certainly complicated the conversation around housing finance reform and I would agree that we need a whole lot more transparency.”
    • Ed DeMarco (Housing Policy Council) referenced a February 2010 letter to Congress in which he stated: “After considering the statutory requirement and goals of conservatorship, I have concluded that permitting the Enterprises to engage in new products is inconsistent with the goals of conservatorship… In short, the Enterprises will be limited to continuing their existing core business activities and taking actions necessary to advance the goals of conservatorship.”
  • Politico reports on the GSEs’ market expansion. Earlier this week Politico featured an article that includes in-depth analysis of the Enterprises “quietly expanding their activities to fortify themselves against any efforts to rein them in,” and features observations from key housing experts. The article notes that recent activities and pilots have drawn scrutiny from members of Congress, with Rep. French Hill (R-AR) expressing concern about the GSEs’ mission creep to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, stating “The GSEs’ attempt to obtain expanded powers [is intended] to put them in an even more powerful position as reform proposals are considered by Congress.”
  • S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Fed Chair Jerome Powell call for GSE reform. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified before the House Financial Services Committee. During the hearing, Mnuchin stated the country needs GSE reform, saying it is “something that I am determined, in the next Congress, should be a major focus of ours — hopefully on a bipartisan basis. But we can’t just leave these things sitting the way they are as they have been.” Mnuchin also responded to a question from Congressman French Hill (R-AR) about the GSEs focusing on their core mission of serving secondary mortgage market homeowners and not competing with the private sector, saying: “…I think they should stay to their core business.” Fed Chair Jerome Powell testified separately before the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking Committee. He stated that housing finance reform remains the most significant unfinished business from the financial crisis. Specifically, Powell said, “It is really important for the longer run that we get the housing finance system off the federal government’s balance sheet and, using market forces and some of the things that are already in place, carry forward with some kind of reform.” Powell added it “continues to be a good time to move forward on [housing finance reform] … It is unsustainable to effectively have the U.S. housing finance system on the government’s books for the long run and it is not healthy.” Powell has previously called for moving to a housing finance system that relies even more on private capital to stand between housing credit risk and taxpayers. These comments by Sec. Mnuchin and Chairman Powell come just as longtime Fannie Mae executive Timothy Mayopoulos — who has served as the GSE’s CEO since April 2012 — announced his retirement effective end of 2018.
  • Senate holds nomination hearing on Michael Bright to be Ginnie Mae President. The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a nomination hearing on Michael Bright, who was nominated by President Donald Trump in May 2018 to become the next President of Ginnie Mae. During the hearing, Bright was asked about a 2016 paper he co-wrote on housing finance reform, which proposed placing the GSEs in receivership and establishing Ginnie Mae as a standalone entity separate from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Bright said in the hearing, however, that he does not intend to advance those proposals as President of Ginnie Mae. It was also noted in the hearing that Bright helped write 2013 legislation to reform the GSEs as a former aide to Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN). During discussion about his past work, Bright said “aspects of conservatorship have been more durable” than originally thought at the time the 2013 bill was drafted.
  • FHA Commissioner Brian Montgomery prioritizes technology upgrades as part of FHA reform. FHA Commissioner Brian Montgomery said that he wants to make sure FHA is around for “generations to come” and described the agency as being in “fix-it mode.” Commissioner Montgomery is specifically focused on prioritizing technology upgrades to replace mainframes currently in use at HUD and the FHA. According to April 2018 testimony from Dana Wade, General Deputy Assistant Secretary of FHA, “there were 73 outages of FHA’s origination systems during 2017, with durations lasting as long as five days.” There is universal agreement among housing finance stakeholders that the FHA’s 40+-year-old mainframe system is in dire need of updating and that the agency’s continued use and reliance on an obsolete programing language creates significant taxpayer risk.
  • National Mortgage News lists potential new FHFA Directors. Yesterday the mortgage news outlet released an article that puts forth seven possible contenders to run the FHFA after current Director Mel Watt’s term expires in January 2019. The list of potential successors includes federal policymakers and respected housing finance experts including Adolfo Marzol, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, Mark Calabria, Michael Bright, Craig Phillips, Ed DeMarco, and Phillip Swagel. As the article notes, the Administration’s selection of the next FHFA Director will have significant implications for the GSEs, including what reforms might be pursued and achieved during the Trump Administration, as well as the broader housing finance market. The term of current FHFA Director Mel Watt ends January 6, 2019.

Press Release: U.S. Mortgage Insurers Names National MI’s Bradley Shuster As Chairman

WASHINGTON—U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) today announced that Bradley Shuster will serve as the association’s new Chairman of the Board. Shuster is the Chairman and CEO of National Mortgage Insurance Corporation (National MI) and its parent, NMI Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: NMIH). He succeeds Patrick Sinks, CEO of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC). Shuster’s appointment comes at a significant time in the housing finance system, which remains at the center of national policy debates.

“The housing finance system continues to strengthen and make enhancements to safety and soundness that make it more resilient, and the private mortgage insurance industry has played a significant role in these improvements. As policymakers consider how to put the housing finance system on a sustainable, long-term path for the future, I am excited to serve as USMI’s Chairman to continue to champion the important role private mortgage insurance plays – and will continue to play – in facilitating responsible low down payment lending while protecting the government and taxpayers against mortgage credit risk,” said Shuster.

Shuster previously served as USMI’s Vice Chair. He has served as National MI’s Chairman and CEO since April 2012, and brings more than 30 years of experience in the housing finance industry to USMI’s chairmanship. He previously served in the leadership team of The PMI Group, Inc. for over a decade and was a partner at Deloitte LLP where he served as the Partner-In-Charge of the firm’s Northern California Insurance Practice and Mortgage Banking Practice. Shuster also held several consulting positions assisting private investors in the insurance industry.

“We are excited to welcome Brad as USMI’s new Chairman. His leadership and tenure in the mortgage insurance industry will be invaluable as we continue our important work of promoting homeownership and providing Americans with access to affordable and safe mortgage financing,” said Lindsey Johnson, President of USMI. “I want to also offer my profound thanks to Pat Sinks for his commitment to USMI and tireless work as Chairman for the last two years. Pat’s efforts have been vital to USMI and the mortgage insurance industry, and we are grateful that he will continue to serve on our board of directors.”

Richard Thornberry, who is the CEO of Radian Group Inc., will become Vice Chair for USMI.

###

U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) is dedicated to a housing finance system backed by private capital that enables access to housing finance for borrowers while protecting taxpayers. Mortgage insurance offers an effective way to make mortgage credit available to more people. USMI is ready to help build the future of homeownership. Learn more at www.usmi.org.

Newsletter: June 2018

It’s a good day to be a Washington Capitals fan! #ALLCAPS #ROCKTHERED! As summer heats up, so do several issues and developments in the housing industry. This week USMI released a new report on how private mortgage insurance (MI) has helped nearly 30 million homeowners nationwide for more than 60 years.  In addition, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) received a number of comment letters on its Notice of Regulatory Review process, including from USMI and the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), among others. Housing has also been a big topic in Congress lately as the U.S. Senate voted to confirm Brian Montgomery as the new Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner, and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a hearing on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s (the GSEs) 10 years of conservatorship. And last but certainly not least, June is National Homeownership Month and we recognize the National Fair Housing Alliance, which will host its annual conference next week that celebrates the 50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act.

  • USMI releases new report on private MI’s role in homeownership nationwide. USMI released a national report on the role of private MI in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The report found that nearly 30 million homeowners have been served by MI for more than 60 years, and breaks down low down payment mortgage lending with MI in all 50 states. The report also underscores the historic importance of MI, how MI has helped promote homebuying in the U.S. especially with first-time buyers, and the protections that MI provides to American taxpayers and the federal government. The complete report on MI in the U.S. is available here. All 50 states fact sheets, plus data for the District of Columbia, are available here.
  • Trades, including USMI and MBA, submit comment letters on FHFA Notice of Regulatory Review. This week, USMI submitted a comment letter to the FHFA on its Notice of Regulatory Review as part of the agency’s five-year Regulatory Review Plan, which identifies agency rules that should be changed or modified. In its letter, USMI suggests that FHFA should reassess its “Prior Approval for Enterprise Products” interim final rule for the GSEs, because though the regulation establishes a process for the GSEs to obtain prior approval from the FHFA for new products—and provide prior notice to the FHFA for new activities—the regulation is “unused [since its implementation in 2009] and apparently not fit for purpose.” USMI argues that “new activities and products have the potential to significantly impact many stakeholders in the housing finance ecosystem—GSEs, lenders, private mortgage insurers, borrowers, and the American taxpayer” and therefore “stakeholders should not have to rely on mechanisms that sidestep the Administrative Procedure Act such as ‘requests for input’ to offer feedback on new activities and programs proposed by the GSEs.” Further, USMI notes that since becoming conservator of the GSEs in 2008, FHFA has not addressed the interaction between its regulatory and conservatorship authorities. For these reasons, USMI urges FHFA to “withdraw the Regulation and resubmit a new proposed rule for a formal notice and comment period with additional clarity on the FHFA’s role and authority as conservator and regulator of the GSEs, as well as a workable approach for assessing new activities and products.”As reported by Inside Mortgage Finance (subscription), MBA also submitted a comment letter urging FHFA to require public disclosure on “any notice” of new business activities being planned by the GSEs. Among other things, MBA asks that FHFA specify the factors and metrics it will consider when determining whether a new activity constitutes as a new product or new activity, and specifically calls on FHFA to modify the manner in which it addresses new activities characterized as “pilots.”
  • Brian Montgomery confirmed as new FHA Commissioner. Brian Montgomery, a respected housing expert and seasoned mortgage finance professional, was confirmed in a widely bipartisan vote to serve as President Trump’s FHA Commissioner. Commissioner Montgomery, who previously served as FHA Commissioner in the George W. Bush administration, will be responsible for overseeing the more than $1 trillion of insurance in force at the FHA as well as addressing some of the challenges facing the FHA going forward.Upon Commissioner Montgomery’s confirmation, USMI President Lindsey Johnson released a statement praising the Senate confirmation of the new FHA Commissioner: “USMI applauds the Senate for its bipartisan vote to confirm Brian Montgomery to serve as FHA Commissioner… We look forward to working closely and collaboratively with Commissioner Montgomery to create a more coordinated, consistent, and transparent housing system – a system that can expand private capital’s role in shouldering more risk in front of taxpayers in the housing market.”
  • Senate holds hearing on “Ten Years of Conservatorship” of the GSEs. The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs recently held a hearing entitled “Ten Years of Conservatorship: The Status of the Housing Finance System,” in which FHFA Director Mel Watt testified on the GSEs’ activities over the last ten years under federal control. During his testimony, Director Watt said that FHFA has “worked with the Enterprises to develop a Conservator Capital Framework [CCF] that establishes aligned capital guidelines for both Enterprises across different mortgage loan and asset categories” and that FHFA uses the CCF to assess GSE guaranty fees, activities, and operations. Director Watt suggested that, as regulator, he believes it is important for FHFA to “articulate a view on prudential capital requirements for the Enterprises.” Director Watt suggested that FHFA will release for public comment a proposed rule for post-conservatorship risk-based capital and minimum leverage capital requirements.During the question and answer portion of the hearing, Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) focused on the CCF and asked if Director Watt agreed that “capital for these institutions should be fairly close at least to some of the larger banking institutions.” Senator Corker also spoke to the GSEs’ footprint, suggesting that “there are some areas where it [the footprint] has expanded… We have a situation now where Freddie Mac is now lending, they have become a lender their servicers.” Senator Corker noted “some of the pilot programs over the last five years have actually expanded the role of the two GSEs,” specifically pointing to Fannie Mae’s recent increase in debt-to-income ratios and its “financing Airbnb” as examples of expansions of the GSEs in the marketplace. Senator Corker said, “there has actually been an expansion of mission, and so while we have gotten the portfolios down it appears that instead of trying to decrease the footprint over time, over the last five years we are beginning to, especially in the last couple years, expand the mission.”Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) asked Director Watt about the recent release of the IMAGIN product into the market place, and specifically “why there was not maybe even a traditional rulemaking process or a period of public comment to consider this.” Senator Toomey also questioned the recent financing of mortgage service companies, noting that “this looks like new kinds of activities, new practices, where we have not seen an explanation, an opportunity to comment and to get public input on.” Director Watt responded that “if I took public comment on every pilot that we did, we would never do any.” Senator Toomey ended his line of questions by asking Director Watt to respond in writing with an explanation for the rationale behind the program.
  • National Fair Housing Alliance celebrates 50th Anniversary of Fair Housing Act. The National Fair Housing Alliance will hold its annual conference next week celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act. The conference, titled “The Fair Housing Act at 50: Making Every Neighborhood a Place of Opportunity” will be held June 9 through 12 and aims to bring together thought leaders and experts on civil and human rights, housing, lending, insurance, education, transportation, health, environmental justice, and community development to examine achievements made under the Fair Housing Act. The conference will also observe the current barriers to fair housing and inclusion, and what is on the horizon in the coming years. More information about the events commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act can be found here.

Report: Texas Ranks First in U.S. for Number of Homebuyers Who Secured Home Financing Thanks to Private Mortgage Insurance

Findings Demonstrate Important Contributions by Private Mortgage Insurance to Texas Homeownership

WASHINGTON U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI), the association representing five of the six top private mortgage insurance (MI) companies in the United States, today released a report on the role of private MI in Texas. The report found that 79,030 homeowners in Texas secured a home loan with private MI in 2017, which ranks first in the nation in terms of the number of homeowners helped with MI, and breaks down low down payment mortgage lending in Texas.

“Private mortgage insurance has helped millions of first-time and middle-income homebuyers across the United States for more than 60 years and has had a tremendous impact in supporting homeownership in Texas. This report confirms what we have long known: MI is a critical piece of the U.S. housing finance system, helping Texans realize the dream of homeownership while providing important protections to Texas taxpayers,” said Lindsey Johnson, President of USMI. “For decades, low down payment borrowers in Texas have relied on MI to help them affordably and responsibly buy a home, and MI will continue to serve countless more prospective Texas homebuyers in the years to come.”

For many Texans, the biggest hurdle in buying a home is the 20 percent down payment they think is required for mortgage approval. It would take the average Texas homebuyer 18 years to save the full 20 percent down payment for a home. MI helps bridge the down payment gap so borrowers can obtain the financing needed to purchase a home, and in doing so allows Texas homeowners to build the kind of long-term wealth that comes with having equity in a home.

According to the report’s findings, 79,030 Texas borrowers became homeowners with the help of MI in 2017. Of these homeowners:

  • 55 percent were first-time buyers
  • 737 was the average FICO score
  • $233,650 was the average loan amount with MI

The report also highlights the number of minority homebuyers, including African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asian-Americans, who have successfully purchase a home in Texas. In 2017, 613,325 total loans were made in Texas, and of that total 200,279– or nearly 33 percent – were purchased or refinanced by minority borrowers.

“Since 1957, private mortgage insurance has played a critical role in helping first-time buyers and low- to moderate-income earners in Texas achieve affordable home financing. Through this successful homeownership, families can build home equity and are able to enhance their financial stability—both of which greatly benefit Texas communities,” Johnson added. “The MI industry has been a time-tested partner for millions of Americans nationwide as they become homeowners, and we will continue to offer this important and competitive product to countless more Texans in the years to come.”

The complete report can be found here and a data fact sheet on MI in Texas is available here.

Press Release: New Report Shows Importance of Private Mortgage Insurance in Helping Low Down Payment Borrowers Qualify for Mortgages in All 50 States

TX, CA, FL, IL and MI are Top Five States in 2017

WASHINGTONJune 7, 2018 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI), the association representing five of the top six private mortgage insurance (MI) companies in the United States, today released a report on the role of MI in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The report finds that nearly 30 million homeowners have been served by MI for more than 60 years, and breaks down on a state-by-state basis low down payment mortgage lending. The report underscores the historic importance of MI, how MI has helped promote homebuying in the U.S., and the significant protection against undue mortgage credit risk that MI provides to American taxpayers and the federal government.

“Private mortgage insurance has helped millions of first-time and middle-income homebuyers across the United Statesfor more than 60 years. This report confirms what we have long known: MI is a critical piece of the U.S. housing finance system, helping Americans realize the dream of homeownership while providing important protections to taxpayers and the federal government,” said Lindsey Johnson, President of USMI. “For decades, low down payment borrowers have relied on MI to help them affordably and responsibly buy a home, and MI will continue to serve countless more prospective homebuyers in the years to come.”

The report looks at how MI helps bridge the down payment gap that affects many borrowers and analyzes at a state level who specifically benefits from MI. The report presents data that highlights:

  • The number of years it takes to save a 20 percent down payment in all 50 states plus the District of Columbia
  • The total number of homeowners helped by MI in 2017 broken down by state—and key lending characteristics including average home price and credit scores of borrowers with MI
  • The number of minority borrowers who have obtained or refinanced mortgages broken down by state

Since 1957, MI has helped more than 30 million families qualify for a mortgage by bridging the gap between the down payment and home financing. In 2017 alone, MI helped more than one million borrowers purchase or refinance a mortgage; of that total number of borrowers, 56 percent were first-time homebuyers and more than 40 percent had annual incomes below $75,000. The top five states in which MI was used by borrowers to purchase homes in 2017 are:

  1. Texas: 79,030 borrowers (55 percent first-time homebuyers)
  2. California: 72,938 borrowers (66 percent first-time homebuyers)
  3. Florida: 69,827 borrowers (58 percent first-time homebuyers)
  4. Illinois: 47,866 borrowers (63 percent first-time homebuyers)
  5. Michigan: 41,810 borrowers (57 percent first-time homebuyers)

 

The report also focuses on how MI reduces taxpayers’ exposure to mortgage credit risk and protects the federal government from that risk. MI serves as credit protection against mortgage credit risk in the event of a borrower defaulting on his or her mortgage, meaning every dollar that an MI company covers when a borrower defaults on his or her mortgage is a dollar that the GSEs and taxpayers do not have to pay. In fact, since the 2008 financial crisis the MI industry has paid over $50 billion in claims – losses the government and taxpayers did not have to bear.

“Coming out of the financial crisis, the MI industry is even stronger with more robust underwriting standards, stronger capital positions, and improved risk management. The MI industry follows a strict set of requirements to insure mortgages acquired by the GSEs, which are known as Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements, and has implemented Master Policy Agreements to bring more efficiency and greater transparency to payment of claims,” added Johnson. “MI has played a critical role in protecting taxpayers and the federal government from undue mortgage credit risk for six decades, and will continue to provide this important function in the housing finance system moving forward.”

The complete report on MI in the U.S. is available here. All 50 states fact sheets, plus data for the District of Columbia, are available here.

###

U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) is dedicated to a housing finance system backed by private capital that enables access to housing finance for borrowers while protecting taxpayers. Mortgage insurance offers an effective way to make mortgage credit available to more people. USMI is ready to help build the future of homeownership. Learn more at www.usmi.org.

SOURCE U.S. Mortgage Insurers

This release originally appeared on PR Newswire. Click here to view the original release.